MEMS

EV Group Revolutionizes Lithography With New Maskless Exposure Technology

Featured Products

Comments (2)
  1. skeptic says:

    “MLE achieves the same patterning performance regardless of photoresist.”
    This is impossible to believe. A low-cost resist vs. a high-performance resist will have different results always.

    “high throughput and low CoO” … “is ideal for processing a range of substrates from small silicon or compound semiconductor wafers up to panel sizes.”
    The more flexible or over-engineered the system is, the more it costs. If it can run both panel and 4″ GaAs wafers then it is not optimized to be cost effective for either.

  2. JW Yeqaf says:

    “MLE achieves the same patterning performance regardless of photoresist”
    This is impossible to believe. A low-cost vs. a high-performance resist will always have different results.

    “high throughput and low CoO” … “is ideal for processing a range of substrates from small silicon or compound semiconductor wafers up to panel sizes”
    If the tool is over-engineered then it is not cost-effective. If a tool can expose both 4″ wafers and large panels then it is not optimized for either.